ClimateSearch

Açailândia, Maranhão

Brazil · 111k people · 242 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high88°F (31°C)87°F (31°C)87°F (31°C)88°F (31°C)90°F (32°C)92°F (33°C)93°F (34°C)94°F (35°C)94°F (34°C)93°F (34°C)91°F (33°C)89°F (32°C)
Average low69°F (21°C)69°F (21°C)69°F (21°C)69°F (21°C)69°F (21°C)66°F (19°C)65°F (18°C)65°F (19°C)68°F (20°C)71°F (21°C)71°F (22°C)70°F (21°C)
Dew point72°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)73°F (23°C)73°F (23°C)72°F (22°C)68°F (20°C)64°F (18°C)63°F (17°C)66°F (19°C)68°F (20°C)71°F (21°C)72°F (22°C)
Rainfall8.1 in (205 mm)9.7 in (247 mm)11.9 in (303 mm)8.5 in (215 mm)3.2 in (82 mm)0.8 in (20 mm)0.4 in (9 mm)0.2 in (4 mm)0.6 in (16 mm)1.6 in (40 mm)3.9 in (100 mm)6 in (153 mm)
Rainy days18192216721013913
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine137 h115 h125 h141 h198 h243 h264 h282 h266 h246 h192 h175 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.5°F (+0.8°C)

Models range from +0.8°F (+0.5°C) to +2.5°F (+1.4°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

101 → 137

About 1.4× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • February: +1.5°F (+0.9°C)
  • March: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • May: +1.9°F (+1.0°C)
  • June: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • August: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • September: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • October: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
  • November: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • December: +1.5°F (+0.9°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.