ClimateSearch

Açailândia, Maranhão

Brazil · 111k people · 242 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high83°F (29°C)83°F (28°C)83°F (28°C)83°F (28°C)84°F (29°C)87°F (31°C)89°F (32°C)92°F (33°C)92°F (34°C)91°F (33°C)89°F (31°C)86°F (30°C)
Average low72°F (22°C)71°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)71°F (22°C)71°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)73°F (23°C)74°F (23°C)74°F (23°C)73°F (23°C)
Dew point72°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)73°F (23°C)73°F (23°C)72°F (22°C)68°F (20°C)64°F (18°C)63°F (17°C)66°F (19°C)68°F (20°C)71°F (21°C)72°F (22°C)
Rainfall10 in (254 mm)10.2 in (258 mm)11.8 in (301 mm)8.3 in (210 mm)4 in (102 mm)0.6 in (16 mm)0.4 in (9 mm)0.2 in (5 mm)0.6 in (15 mm)1.7 in (42 mm)4.1 in (103 mm)6.4 in (162 mm)
Rainy days2726292515421381522
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine281 h244 h269 h278 h325 h336 h345 h357 h353 h361 h325 h316 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.5°F (+0.8°C)

Models range from +0.8°F (+0.5°C) to +2.5°F (+1.4°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

101 137

About 1.4× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • February: +1.5°F (+0.9°C)
  • March: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • May: +1.9°F (+1.0°C)
  • June: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • August: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • September: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • October: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
  • November: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • December: +1.5°F (+0.9°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.