ClimateSearch

Al-Junaynah, Western Darfur

Sudan · 163k people · 798 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high88°F (31°C)93°F (34°C)98°F (37°C)102°F (39°C)102°F (39°C)99°F (37°C)92°F (33°C)87°F (31°C)92°F (34°C)96°F (35°C)93°F (34°C)89°F (32°C)
Average low54°F (12°C)58°F (15°C)64°F (18°C)69°F (21°C)73°F (23°C)74°F (23°C)71°F (22°C)70°F (21°C)69°F (20°C)65°F (19°C)60°F (16°C)55°F (13°C)
Dew point24°F (-4°C)22°F (-5°C)22°F (-5°C)28°F (-2°C)42°F (6°C)57°F (14°C)67°F (20°C)69°F (20°C)65°F (18°C)48°F (9°C)33°F (1°C)28°F (-2°C)
Rainfall0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0.1 in (2 mm)0.4 in (10 mm)1.3 in (32 mm)5.2 in (131 mm)7.1 in (181 mm)2.7 in (68 mm)0.5 in (12 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)
Rainy days00012513176200
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine275 h250 h270 h273 h283 h250 h192 h155 h206 h261 h271 h276 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.6°F (+0.9°C)

Models range from +0.8°F (+0.4°C) to +2.1°F (+1.2°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

207 → 219

About 1.1× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +0.6°F (+0.3°C)
  • February: +1.0°F (+0.5°C)
  • March: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • April: +1.9°F (+1.0°C)
  • May: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • June: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • August: +1.0°F (+0.5°C)
  • September: +0.4°F (+0.2°C)
  • October: +0.4°F (+0.2°C)
  • November: +0.8°F (+0.5°C)
  • December: +0.7°F (+0.4°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.