ClimateSearch

Al Miqdādīyah, Diyala

Iraq · 156k people · 61 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high63°F (17°C)67°F (20°C)76°F (25°C)85°F (30°C)97°F (36°C)107°F (42°C)111°F (44°C)111°F (44°C)103°F (39°C)93°F (34°C)77°F (25°C)66°F (19°C)
Average low43°F (6°C)47°F (8°C)53°F (12°C)61°F (16°C)71°F (22°C)79°F (26°C)83°F (28°C)82°F (28°C)74°F (23°C)65°F (19°C)53°F (12°C)46°F (8°C)
Dew point40°F (4°C)40°F (4°C)40°F (5°C)43°F (6°C)41°F (5°C)39°F (4°C)42°F (6°C)43°F (6°C)41°F (5°C)41°F (5°C)43°F (6°C)41°F (5°C)
Rainfall1.3 in (33 mm)1.5 in (39 mm)1.1 in (28 mm)0.8 in (20 mm)0.2 in (6 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0.1 in (4 mm)1.1 in (28 mm)1.6 in (41 mm)
Rainy days554310000145
Snowfall0 in (0.1 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine196 h199 h246 h257 h317 h394 h406 h367 h339 h263 h211 h193 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.6°F (+1.4°C)

Models range from +2.3°F (+1.3°C) to +2.9°F (+1.6°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

178 → 185

Roughly unchanged

Warming by month
  • January: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • February: +1.2°F (+0.6°C)
  • March: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • April: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • May: +0.7°F (+0.4°C)
  • June: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • July: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • August: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • September: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
  • October: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • November: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • December: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.