ClimateSearch

Ambarnath, Maharashtra

India · 253k people · 44 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high90°F (32°C)93°F (34°C)97°F (36°C)98°F (37°C)98°F (37°C)92°F (34°C)87°F (31°C)87°F (30°C)88°F (31°C)93°F (34°C)94°F (35°C)92°F (33°C)
Average low61°F (16°C)64°F (18°C)70°F (21°C)76°F (24°C)81°F (27°C)80°F (26°C)78°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)76°F (24°C)74°F (23°C)69°F (20°C)64°F (18°C)
Dew point55°F (13°C)55°F (13°C)59°F (15°C)67°F (20°C)73°F (23°C)75°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)74°F (24°C)74°F (24°C)71°F (21°C)62°F (17°C)57°F (14°C)
Rainfall0 in (1 mm)0 in (1 mm)0.1 in (1 mm)0.1 in (2 mm)0.7 in (18 mm)23.5 in (598 mm)52.3 in (1329 mm)34.8 in (884 mm)19.9 in (506 mm)5.1 in (129 mm)0.3 in (8 mm)0 in (1 mm)
Rainy days0000122313021810
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine282 h266 h304 h301 h279 h116 h51 h66 h129 h228 h250 h255 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.5°F (+0.9°C)

Models range from +1.3°F (+0.7°C) to +1.9°F (+1.0°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

177 → 203

About 1.1× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.0°F (+0.6°C)
  • February: +1.0°F (+0.6°C)
  • March: +1.0°F (+0.6°C)
  • April: +0.8°F (+0.5°C)
  • May: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • June: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • July: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • August: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • September: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • October: +0.6°F (+0.4°C)
  • November: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • December: +0.9°F (+0.5°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.