ClimateSearch

Antipolo, Calabarzon

Philippines · 914k people · 23 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high87°F (31°C)89°F (32°C)92°F (33°C)95°F (35°C)95°F (35°C)92°F (33°C)90°F (32°C)89°F (32°C)89°F (32°C)90°F (32°C)89°F (32°C)88°F (31°C)
Average low72°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)74°F (23°C)76°F (24°C)77°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)76°F (25°C)76°F (25°C)76°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)74°F (24°C)74°F (23°C)
Dew point69°F (20°C)68°F (20°C)69°F (21°C)72°F (22°C)74°F (23°C)75°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)74°F (23°C)73°F (23°C)71°F (22°C)
Rainfall1.7 in (44 mm)1.4 in (35 mm)1.4 in (35 mm)1.6 in (42 mm)7.5 in (190 mm)10.8 in (275 mm)18.9 in (479 mm)18.6 in (474 mm)16.1 in (409 mm)9.5 in (241 mm)5.9 in (150 mm)6 in (152 mm)
Rainy days232312192525231376
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine218 h212 h252 h254 h202 h161 h120 h116 h121 h162 h187 h189 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+0.9°F (+0.5°C)

Models range from −1.3°F (−0.7°C) to +1.7°F (+1.0°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

38 → 61

About 1.6× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.0°F (+0.6°C)
  • February: +0.9°F (+0.5°C)
  • March: +1.0°F (+0.5°C)
  • April: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • May: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • June: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • July: +0.9°F (+0.5°C)
  • August: +0.6°F (+0.3°C)
  • September: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • October: +1.1°F (+0.6°C)
  • November: +1.1°F (+0.6°C)
  • December: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.