ClimateSearch

Balcón de la Lisa, Havana

Cuba · 147k people · 55 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high78°F (26°C)80°F (27°C)82°F (28°C)85°F (30°C)87°F (30°C)88°F (31°C)89°F (32°C)89°F (32°C)87°F (31°C)85°F (29°C)81°F (27°C)80°F (27°C)
Average low67°F (20°C)68°F (20°C)69°F (21°C)72°F (22°C)74°F (24°C)77°F (25°C)78°F (25°C)78°F (26°C)77°F (25°C)75°F (24°C)72°F (22°C)69°F (21°C)
Dew point62°F (17°C)62°F (17°C)63°F (17°C)65°F (19°C)69°F (21°C)73°F (23°C)74°F (23°C)74°F (23°C)74°F (23°C)71°F (22°C)66°F (19°C)64°F (18°C)
Rainfall1.2 in (32 mm)1.1 in (28 mm)0.8 in (21 mm)1.2 in (30 mm)3.3 in (85 mm)5.3 in (134 mm)3.3 in (85 mm)4.2 in (107 mm)5.1 in (130 mm)3.5 in (90 mm)1.3 in (34 mm)0.9 in (23 mm)
Rainy days644512181718191465
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine305 h295 h341 h363 h374 h339 h382 h367 h314 h307 h297 h305 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.1°F (+1.2°C)

Models range from +1.6°F (+0.9°C) to +2.6°F (+1.5°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

41 109

About 2.7× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • February: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • March: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • April: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • May: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • June: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • July: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • August: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • September: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • October: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • November: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • December: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.