ClimateSearch

Bandırma, Balıkesir

Turkey · 108k people · 39 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high48°F (9°C)50°F (10°C)55°F (13°C)63°F (17°C)72°F (22°C)80°F (27°C)84°F (29°C)84°F (29°C)78°F (25°C)69°F (21°C)60°F (16°C)52°F (11°C)
Average low36°F (2°C)37°F (3°C)40°F (4°C)45°F (7°C)53°F (12°C)62°F (17°C)68°F (20°C)69°F (20°C)61°F (16°C)54°F (12°C)45°F (7°C)40°F (4°C)
Dew point37°F (3°C)37°F (3°C)40°F (5°C)46°F (8°C)54°F (12°C)60°F (16°C)64°F (18°C)65°F (18°C)59°F (15°C)54°F (12°C)47°F (8°C)40°F (5°C)
Rainfall4 in (101 mm)2.8 in (72 mm)2.6 in (65 mm)2.1 in (53 mm)1.4 in (36 mm)1 in (25 mm)0.5 in (13 mm)0.5 in (12 mm)1.8 in (46 mm)2.5 in (63 mm)2.9 in (75 mm)4.7 in (120 mm)
Rainy days1110107531146812
Snowfall4.1 in (10.3 cm)3.8 in (9.7 cm)1.3 in (3.4 cm)0.1 in (0.2 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.1 in (0.2 cm)2.7 in (6.8 cm)
Sunshine101 h113 h167 h202 h262 h310 h356 h329 h255 h172 h123 h85 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.4°F (+1.4°C)

Models range from +1.3°F (+0.7°C) to +3.3°F (+1.9°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

11 → 16

About 1.5× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • February: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • March: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
  • April: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • May: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • June: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
  • July: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • August: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • September: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • October: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • November: +1.9°F (+1.0°C)
  • December: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.