ClimateSearch

Bharūch, Gujarat

India · 169k people · 15 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high85°F (29°C)89°F (32°C)96°F (36°C)101°F (38°C)101°F (38°C)94°F (35°C)87°F (30°C)85°F (30°C)88°F (31°C)93°F (34°C)91°F (33°C)86°F (30°C)
Average low60°F (16°C)63°F (17°C)69°F (21°C)76°F (24°C)80°F (27°C)81°F (27°C)79°F (26°C)78°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)74°F (23°C)68°F (20°C)62°F (17°C)
Dew point50°F (10°C)50°F (10°C)53°F (12°C)61°F (16°C)70°F (21°C)75°F (24°C)76°F (25°C)76°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)67°F (19°C)58°F (14°C)53°F (11°C)
Rainfall0.1 in (2 mm)0 in (1 mm)0 in (1 mm)0 in (1 mm)0.1 in (2 mm)4.9 in (125 mm)10.7 in (271 mm)9.5 in (240 mm)6.3 in (161 mm)1.1 in (27 mm)0.3 in (8 mm)0.2 in (4 mm)
Rainy days0000011242313410
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine329 h310 h355 h359 h375 h313 h227 h233 h295 h334 h306 h308 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.6°F (+0.9°C)

Models range from +1.2°F (+0.7°C) to +2.0°F (+1.1°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

186 203

About 1.1× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +0.4°F (+0.2°C)
  • February: +0.6°F (+0.3°C)
  • March: +0.6°F (+0.4°C)
  • April: +0.6°F (+0.3°C)
  • May: +0.7°F (+0.4°C)
  • June: +1.5°F (+0.9°C)
  • July: +1.9°F (+1.0°C)
  • August: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • September: +1.0°F (+0.6°C)
  • October: +0.1°F (+0.1°C)
  • November: +0.4°F (+0.2°C)
  • December: +0.5°F (+0.3°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.