ClimateSearch

Bīrjand, South Khorasan Province

Iran · 197k people · 1458 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high55°F (13°C)60°F (15°C)68°F (20°C)78°F (26°C)88°F (31°C)96°F (36°C)98°F (37°C)96°F (35°C)91°F (33°C)81°F (27°C)68°F (20°C)59°F (15°C)
Average low29°F (-2°C)34°F (1°C)42°F (6°C)51°F (11°C)59°F (15°C)66°F (19°C)69°F (20°C)65°F (18°C)56°F (14°C)47°F (9°C)37°F (3°C)30°F (-1°C)
Dew point25°F (-4°C)28°F (-2°C)31°F (0°C)34°F (1°C)33°F (1°C)33°F (1°C)37°F (3°C)33°F (1°C)28°F (-2°C)27°F (-3°C)27°F (-3°C)25°F (-4°C)
Rainfall0.9 in (24 mm)1.2 in (30 mm)1.4 in (35 mm)0.9 in (22 mm)0.2 in (5 mm)0.1 in (1 mm)0 in (1 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (1 mm)0.2 in (4 mm)0.4 in (10 mm)0.7 in (18 mm)
Rainy days567410000124
Snowfall3.2 in (8.2 cm)2 in (5 cm)0.5 in (1.3 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.1 in (0.2 cm)0.9 in (2.3 cm)
Sunshine210 h206 h242 h255 h319 h379 h395 h366 h345 h295 h231 h219 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+3.2°F (+1.8°C)

Models range from +2.8°F (+1.6°C) to +3.7°F (+2.1°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

76 → 98

About 1.3× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.9°F (+1.0°C)
  • February: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • March: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • May: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • June: +3.5°F (+1.9°C)
  • July: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
  • August: +3.1°F (+1.7°C)
  • September: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
  • October: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • November: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
  • December: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.