ClimateSearch

Caçapava, São Paulo

Brazil · 100k people · 558 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high82°F (28°C)82°F (28°C)81°F (27°C)78°F (26°C)74°F (23°C)73°F (23°C)73°F (23°C)76°F (24°C)78°F (26°C)80°F (27°C)80°F (26°C)81°F (27°C)
Average low67°F (19°C)67°F (19°C)66°F (19°C)63°F (17°C)58°F (14°C)55°F (13°C)54°F (12°C)55°F (13°C)59°F (15°C)62°F (17°C)64°F (18°C)66°F (19°C)
Dew point67°F (19°C)67°F (19°C)66°F (19°C)62°F (17°C)58°F (14°C)55°F (13°C)54°F (12°C)55°F (13°C)58°F (14°C)61°F (16°C)63°F (17°C)65°F (19°C)
Rainfall11.5 in (291 mm)8.8 in (223 mm)7.4 in (188 mm)2.9 in (74 mm)2.4 in (60 mm)1.5 in (37 mm)1.7 in (42 mm)1.4 in (35 mm)3.4 in (87 mm)5.3 in (134 mm)7.2 in (182 mm)8.7 in (220 mm)
Rainy days24202011865510161822
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine288 h279 h296 h285 h269 h262 h272 h293 h278 h288 h287 h305 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.4°F (+0.8°C)

Models range from +1.0°F (+0.6°C) to +1.8°F (+1.0°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

8 16

About 2.2× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • February: +1.0°F (+0.5°C)
  • March: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • April: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • May: +1.1°F (+0.6°C)
  • June: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • July: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • August: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • September: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • October: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • November: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • December: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.