ClimateSearch

Cajamarca, Cajamarca Department

Peru · 201k people · 2685 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high65°F (19°C)65°F (19°C)65°F (19°C)66°F (19°C)66°F (19°C)67°F (19°C)68°F (20°C)69°F (21°C)68°F (20°C)67°F (19°C)67°F (19°C)66°F (19°C)
Average low50°F (10°C)51°F (11°C)51°F (11°C)51°F (10°C)50°F (10°C)49°F (9°C)48°F (9°C)48°F (9°C)49°F (10°C)49°F (10°C)49°F (10°C)50°F (10°C)
Dew point51°F (10°C)52°F (11°C)52°F (11°C)51°F (11°C)50°F (10°C)47°F (9°C)44°F (7°C)44°F (7°C)48°F (9°C)49°F (9°C)47°F (9°C)49°F (10°C)
Rainfall13.3 in (339 mm)15.7 in (399 mm)17.4 in (442 mm)11.1 in (283 mm)5.6 in (141 mm)2.1 in (54 mm)1.1 in (28 mm)1.6 in (41 mm)6 in (152 mm)10 in (253 mm)8.3 in (211 mm)10.9 in (276 mm)
Rainy days2625292620106819251924
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine307 h254 h270 h299 h339 h334 h344 h351 h337 h334 h321 h325 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.8°F (+1.0°C)

Models range from +1.4°F (+0.8°C) to +2.2°F (+1.2°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

0 0

Warming by month
  • January: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • February: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • March: +1.9°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • May: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • June: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • July: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • August: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • September: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • October: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • November: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • December: +1.9°F (+1.0°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.