ClimateSearch

Catanduva, São Paulo

Brazil · 119k people · 516 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high84°F (29°C)84°F (29°C)84°F (29°C)83°F (28°C)79°F (26°C)78°F (26°C)79°F (26°C)83°F (29°C)87°F (30°C)87°F (31°C)85°F (29°C)84°F (29°C)
Average low71°F (21°C)70°F (21°C)69°F (21°C)67°F (19°C)61°F (16°C)60°F (15°C)60°F (15°C)62°F (17°C)66°F (19°C)69°F (20°C)69°F (21°C)70°F (21°C)
Dew point69°F (21°C)69°F (21°C)68°F (20°C)64°F (18°C)58°F (15°C)56°F (13°C)53°F (12°C)52°F (11°C)56°F (13°C)62°F (17°C)66°F (19°C)69°F (20°C)
Rainfall10.4 in (264 mm)7.8 in (197 mm)6.9 in (175 mm)2.7 in (70 mm)1.8 in (46 mm)1.1 in (27 mm)0.7 in (18 mm)0.8 in (21 mm)2.5 in (63 mm)4.4 in (112 mm)6.7 in (170 mm)9.1 in (231 mm)
Rainy days232119963237131823
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine303 h292 h312 h306 h297 h289 h311 h321 h316 h323 h313 h319 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.6°F (+0.9°C)

Models range from +1.2°F (+0.6°C) to +1.9°F (+1.0°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

33 64

About 2.0× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • February: +1.2°F (+0.6°C)
  • March: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • April: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • May: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • June: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • July: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • August: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • September: +3.0°F (+1.6°C)
  • October: +3.2°F (+1.8°C)
  • November: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • December: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.