ClimateSearch

Caxias do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul

Brazil · 480k people · 783 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high77°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)74°F (24°C)70°F (21°C)64°F (18°C)61°F (16°C)61°F (16°C)65°F (18°C)67°F (19°C)70°F (21°C)73°F (23°C)76°F (25°C)
Average low62°F (17°C)62°F (16°C)60°F (15°C)55°F (13°C)49°F (10°C)46°F (8°C)45°F (7°C)47°F (8°C)49°F (10°C)53°F (12°C)55°F (13°C)60°F (15°C)
Dew point63°F (17°C)63°F (17°C)60°F (16°C)56°F (14°C)51°F (11°C)48°F (9°C)47°F (8°C)49°F (9°C)51°F (11°C)55°F (13°C)57°F (14°C)60°F (16°C)
Rainfall8 in (203 mm)7.1 in (181 mm)6.1 in (156 mm)5.5 in (140 mm)5.4 in (138 mm)5.4 in (138 mm)6.9 in (175 mm)5.5 in (139 mm)6.7 in (171 mm)8.4 in (213 mm)6.3 in (161 mm)7.4 in (187 mm)
Rainy days191816121111111113151416
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0.1 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine329 h293 h295 h253 h230 h202 h217 h249 h235 h261 h303 h335 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.7°F (+0.9°C)

Models range from +1.3°F (+0.7°C) to +2.1°F (+1.2°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

Too few hot days today to project a reliable change

Warming by month
  • January: +1.5°F (+0.9°C)
  • February: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • March: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • April: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • May: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • June: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • July: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • August: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • September: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • October: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • November: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • December: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.