ClimateSearch

Caxias do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul

Brazil · 480k people · 783 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high79°F (26°C)78°F (25°C)76°F (24°C)70°F (21°C)64°F (18°C)62°F (17°C)62°F (17°C)65°F (18°C)67°F (19°C)70°F (21°C)75°F (24°C)78°F (25°C)
Average low59°F (15°C)59°F (15°C)58°F (14°C)53°F (12°C)48°F (9°C)46°F (8°C)44°F (6°C)46°F (8°C)49°F (9°C)52°F (11°C)55°F (13°C)57°F (14°C)
Dew point63°F (17°C)63°F (17°C)60°F (16°C)56°F (14°C)51°F (11°C)48°F (9°C)47°F (8°C)49°F (9°C)51°F (11°C)55°F (13°C)57°F (14°C)60°F (16°C)
Rainfall5.8 in (147 mm)5.5 in (140 mm)6.7 in (170 mm)4.7 in (119 mm)5.2 in (133 mm)5.5 in (139 mm)6.3 in (160 mm)5.5 in (141 mm)7 in (178 mm)7.4 in (187 mm)4.8 in (122 mm)6.5 in (165 mm)
Rainy days13121291010101012121112
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0.1 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine211 h189 h196 h167 h145 h125 h142 h168 h146 h152 h200 h220 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.7°F (+0.9°C)

Models range from +1.3°F (+0.7°C) to +2.1°F (+1.2°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

—

Too few hot days today to project a reliable change

Warming by month
  • January: +1.5°F (+0.9°C)
  • February: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • March: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • April: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • May: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • June: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • July: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • August: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • September: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • October: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • November: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • December: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.