ClimateSearch

Ceilândia, Federal District

Brazil · 287k people · 1234 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high78°F (25°C)78°F (26°C)78°F (25°C)78°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)76°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)80°F (27°C)83°F (29°C)82°F (28°C)78°F (26°C)78°F (25°C)
Average low64°F (18°C)64°F (18°C)64°F (18°C)63°F (17°C)60°F (16°C)58°F (14°C)57°F (14°C)60°F (16°C)64°F (18°C)65°F (18°C)64°F (18°C)64°F (18°C)
Dew point63°F (17°C)63°F (17°C)63°F (17°C)61°F (16°C)55°F (13°C)51°F (10°C)47°F (8°C)46°F (8°C)49°F (10°C)57°F (14°C)62°F (17°C)63°F (17°C)
Rainfall9.1 in (232 mm)7.9 in (201 mm)8.1 in (206 mm)3.8 in (96 mm)0.7 in (19 mm)0.2 in (4 mm)0 in (0 mm)0.2 in (6 mm)1.2 in (30 mm)4.5 in (114 mm)8.4 in (214 mm)9.4 in (239 mm)
Rainy days2421221431015152324
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine304 h288 h304 h318 h326 h313 h330 h337 h337 h334 h289 h293 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.6°F (+0.9°C)

Models range from +1.3°F (+0.7°C) to +1.9°F (+1.1°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

3 8

About 2.9× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • February: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • March: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • April: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • May: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • June: +1.9°F (+1.0°C)
  • July: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
  • August: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • September: +3.2°F (+1.8°C)
  • October: +3.8°F (+2.1°C)
  • November: +3.1°F (+1.7°C)
  • December: +1.5°F (+0.9°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.