ClimateSearch

Chéngguān Qū, Tibet

China · 478k people · 3638 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high37°F (3°C)42°F (6°C)48°F (9°C)55°F (13°C)63°F (17°C)69°F (21°C)68°F (20°C)67°F (19°C)64°F (18°C)56°F (13°C)43°F (6°C)39°F (4°C)
Average low13°F (-10°C)20°F (-7°C)26°F (-3°C)32°F (0°C)40°F (5°C)49°F (10°C)52°F (11°C)51°F (11°C)47°F (8°C)35°F (2°C)21°F (-6°C)17°F (-8°C)
Dew point-1°F (-18°C)1°F (-17°C)9°F (-13°C)20°F (-7°C)31°F (-1°C)41°F (5°C)47°F (8°C)47°F (8°C)42°F (6°C)28°F (-2°C)11°F (-12°C)2°F (-16°C)
Rainfall0.4 in (10 mm)0.4 in (10 mm)0.9 in (22 mm)1.7 in (44 mm)2.7 in (68 mm)4.1 in (105 mm)6.1 in (156 mm)6.2 in (156 mm)4.5 in (115 mm)2.2 in (55 mm)0.7 in (17 mm)0.3 in (8 mm)
Rainy days4471316192424211453
Snowfall3.2 in (8.1 cm)3.1 in (7.8 cm)5.6 in (14.2 cm)7.6 in (19.2 cm)5 in (12.8 cm)0.7 in (1.8 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.1 in (0.2 cm)1 in (2.5 cm)6.9 in (17.6 cm)4.5 in (11.4 cm)2.6 in (6.5 cm)
Sunshine309 h297 h356 h355 h390 h372 h327 h318 h330 h335 h310 h306 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.6°F (+1.4°C)

Models range from +1.7°F (+0.9°C) to +3.0°F (+1.7°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

0 0

Warming by month
  • January: +3.9°F (+2.2°C)
  • February: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • March: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • April: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • May: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • June: +2.8°F (+1.5°C)
  • July: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • August: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • September: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • October: +3.2°F (+1.8°C)
  • November: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • December: +3.1°F (+1.7°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.