ClimateSearch

Chiang Mai, Thailand

127k people · 313 m elevation · Köppen Aw · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high82°F (28°C)88°F (31°C)94°F (34°C)96°F (36°C)91°F (33°C)88°F (31°C)86°F (30°C)84°F (29°C)85°F (29°C)84°F (29°C)83°F (28°C)81°F (27°C)
Average low61°F (16°C)65°F (18°C)71°F (21°C)76°F (24°C)76°F (25°C)75°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)74°F (23°C)73°F (23°C)71°F (22°C)66°F (19°C)61°F (16°C)
Dew point59°F (15°C)57°F (14°C)59°F (15°C)64°F (18°C)71°F (22°C)73°F (23°C)73°F (23°C)74°F (23°C)74°F (23°C)72°F (22°C)66°F (19°C)61°F (16°C)
Rainfall0.4 in (9 mm)0.1 in (3 mm)0.5 in (12 mm)1.2 in (31 mm)4.3 in (108 mm)5.3 in (134 mm)7.6 in (194 mm)10.1 in (258 mm)9.5 in (241 mm)4.5 in (113 mm)1 in (24 mm)0.5 in (12 mm)
Rainy days212514202326241642
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine325 h306 h337 h341 h315 h268 h231 h222 h253 h300 h294 h314 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.2°F (+0.7°C)

Models range from +0.8°F (+0.4°C) to +1.6°F (+0.9°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

92 115

About 1.2× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • February: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • March: +0.8°F (+0.4°C)
  • April: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • May: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • June: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • July: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • August: +1.0°F (+0.5°C)
  • September: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • October: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • November: +0.7°F (+0.4°C)
  • December: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.