ClimateSearch

Chiang Mai, Thailand

127k people · 313 m elevation · Köppen Aw · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high86°F (30°C)91°F (33°C)95°F (35°C)97°F (36°C)94°F (34°C)91°F (33°C)89°F (32°C)89°F (32°C)89°F (32°C)89°F (32°C)88°F (31°C)85°F (29°C)
Average low58°F (14°C)60°F (15°C)66°F (19°C)72°F (22°C)74°F (24°C)76°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)74°F (24°C)74°F (23°C)72°F (22°C)66°F (19°C)60°F (15°C)
Dew point59°F (15°C)57°F (14°C)59°F (15°C)64°F (18°C)71°F (22°C)73°F (23°C)73°F (23°C)74°F (23°C)74°F (23°C)72°F (22°C)66°F (19°C)61°F (16°C)
Rainfall0.1 in (3 mm)0.3 in (8 mm)0.9 in (22 mm)2.3 in (58 mm)6.1 in (154 mm)4.5 in (115 mm)6.5 in (165 mm)7.9 in (201 mm)7.2 in (182 mm)4.2 in (107 mm)1.3 in (33 mm)0.4 in (9 mm)
Rainy days012499131513931
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine260 h256 h276 h258 h185 h115 h90 h86 h120 h189 h217 h240 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.2°F (+0.7°C)

Models range from +0.8°F (+0.4°C) to +1.6°F (+0.9°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

92 → 115

About 1.2× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • February: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • March: +0.8°F (+0.4°C)
  • April: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • May: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • June: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • July: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • August: +1.0°F (+0.5°C)
  • September: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • October: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • November: +0.7°F (+0.4°C)
  • December: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.