ClimateSearch

Chikmagalūr, Karnataka

India · 121k people · 1042 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high81°F (27°C)85°F (29°C)89°F (32°C)89°F (32°C)85°F (30°C)77°F (25°C)74°F (23°C)75°F (24°C)77°F (25°C)78°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)78°F (26°C)
Average low58°F (14°C)61°F (16°C)65°F (18°C)69°F (20°C)69°F (21°C)68°F (20°C)67°F (19°C)66°F (19°C)66°F (19°C)65°F (18°C)62°F (17°C)58°F (15°C)
Dew point51°F (11°C)51°F (11°C)55°F (13°C)63°F (17°C)66°F (19°C)67°F (19°C)66°F (19°C)65°F (19°C)65°F (19°C)64°F (18°C)60°F (16°C)54°F (12°C)
Rainfall0.2 in (6 mm)0.4 in (10 mm)0.9 in (23 mm)2.6 in (65 mm)5 in (127 mm)9.9 in (252 mm)12.3 in (313 mm)9.2 in (233 mm)6.6 in (167 mm)7.1 in (179 mm)2.7 in (69 mm)0.7 in (18 mm)
Rainy days1241219272928231993
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine339 h319 h361 h337 h323 h237 h207 h225 h270 h286 h296 h318 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.8°F (+1.0°C)

Models range from +1.4°F (+0.8°C) to +2.2°F (+1.2°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

27 30

About 1.1× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +0.4°F (+0.2°C)
  • February: +0.4°F (+0.2°C)
  • March: +0.3°F (+0.2°C)
  • April: +1.0°F (+0.6°C)
  • May: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • June: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • August: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • September: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • October: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • November: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • December: +1.0°F (+0.6°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.