ClimateSearch

Chinautla, Guatemala

Guatemala · 105k people · 1209 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high78°F (26°C)81°F (27°C)83°F (28°C)84°F (29°C)82°F (28°C)80°F (27°C)81°F (27°C)81°F (27°C)80°F (27°C)79°F (26°C)78°F (25°C)78°F (26°C)
Average low58°F (14°C)59°F (15°C)59°F (15°C)62°F (17°C)63°F (17°C)64°F (18°C)63°F (17°C)63°F (17°C)63°F (17°C)62°F (17°C)60°F (15°C)58°F (15°C)
Dew point54°F (12°C)53°F (12°C)54°F (12°C)57°F (14°C)60°F (16°C)63°F (17°C)61°F (16°C)61°F (16°C)63°F (17°C)61°F (16°C)58°F (14°C)55°F (13°C)
Rainfall0.1 in (3 mm)0.2 in (4 mm)0.2 in (6 mm)1.5 in (39 mm)5.9 in (151 mm)11.7 in (297 mm)8.5 in (216 mm)7.7 in (196 mm)10.7 in (271 mm)6.2 in (159 mm)1.5 in (38 mm)0.3 in (7 mm)
Rainy days011411171313181131
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine239 h234 h267 h244 h185 h139 h186 h185 h147 h169 h198 h229 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.2°F (+1.2°C)

Models range from +1.8°F (+1.0°C) to +3.1°F (+1.7°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

5 → 14

About 2.7× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • February: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • March: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • April: +3.3°F (+1.8°C)
  • May: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • June: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • August: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • September: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • October: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • November: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • December: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.