ClimateSearch

Chincha Alta, Ica

Peru · 153k people · 107 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high82°F (28°C)84°F (29°C)84°F (29°C)81°F (27°C)75°F (24°C)71°F (22°C)69°F (20°C)68°F (20°C)69°F (21°C)72°F (22°C)75°F (24°C)79°F (26°C)
Average low65°F (18°C)66°F (19°C)65°F (19°C)62°F (17°C)58°F (15°C)57°F (14°C)56°F (13°C)56°F (13°C)56°F (14°C)57°F (14°C)59°F (15°C)62°F (17°C)
Dew point66°F (19°C)68°F (20°C)67°F (20°C)64°F (18°C)60°F (16°C)56°F (13°C)54°F (12°C)53°F (12°C)55°F (13°C)56°F (14°C)59°F (15°C)62°F (17°C)
Rainfall0 in (1 mm)0.1 in (1 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0.1 in (2 mm)0.6 in (15 mm)0.6 in (15 mm)0.3 in (9 mm)0.1 in (3 mm)0 in (1 mm)0 in (1 mm)0 in (0 mm)
Rainy days000000000000
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine187 h153 h180 h227 h266 h251 h271 h286 h271 h254 h225 h204 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.6°F (+0.9°C)

Models range from +1.3°F (+0.7°C) to +1.9°F (+1.1°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

0 → 0

Warming by month
  • January: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • February: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • March: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • May: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • June: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • August: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • September: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • October: +1.9°F (+1.0°C)
  • November: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • December: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.