ClimateSearch

Chust, Namangan

Uzbekistan · 100k people · 659 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high39°F (4°C)44°F (7°C)56°F (13°C)68°F (20°C)78°F (26°C)87°F (31°C)92°F (34°C)90°F (32°C)81°F (27°C)67°F (20°C)53°F (12°C)42°F (6°C)
Average low25°F (-4°C)28°F (-2°C)38°F (3°C)48°F (9°C)56°F (13°C)64°F (18°C)69°F (20°C)67°F (20°C)59°F (15°C)48°F (9°C)37°F (3°C)28°F (-2°C)
Dew point19°F (-7°C)23°F (-5°C)33°F (1°C)42°F (6°C)48°F (9°C)51°F (11°C)51°F (11°C)51°F (10°C)45°F (7°C)39°F (4°C)30°F (-1°C)22°F (-6°C)
Rainfall1.3 in (32 mm)2 in (51 mm)2.4 in (60 mm)2.9 in (73 mm)2.7 in (69 mm)1.3 in (32 mm)0.6 in (16 mm)0.5 in (12 mm)0.6 in (16 mm)1.2 in (32 mm)1.7 in (44 mm)1.8 in (45 mm)
Rainy days791212127433689
Snowfall6.1 in (15.4 cm)6.4 in (16.2 cm)2.7 in (6.8 cm)0.5 in (1.3 cm)0 in (0.1 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.2 in (0.5 cm)2.1 in (5.4 cm)6.3 in (15.9 cm)
Sunshine211 h213 h268 h311 h367 h396 h425 h394 h346 h285 h224 h199 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+3.2°F (+1.8°C)

Models range from +2.5°F (+1.4°C) to +4.0°F (+2.2°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

54 68

About 1.3× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.0°F (+0.6°C)
  • February: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • March: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • April: +1.9°F (+1.0°C)
  • May: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • June: +3.5°F (+1.9°C)
  • July: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
  • August: +3.0°F (+1.6°C)
  • September: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
  • October: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • November: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • December: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.