ClimateSearch

Ciego de Ávila, Ciego de Ávila Province

Cuba · 142k people · 48 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high82°F (28°C)84°F (29°C)85°F (30°C)88°F (31°C)89°F (31°C)89°F (32°C)91°F (33°C)92°F (33°C)89°F (32°C)86°F (30°C)83°F (29°C)83°F (28°C)
Average low67°F (20°C)67°F (20°C)68°F (20°C)71°F (22°C)73°F (23°C)75°F (24°C)76°F (25°C)76°F (25°C)75°F (24°C)74°F (23°C)71°F (22°C)69°F (21°C)
Dew point63°F (17°C)63°F (17°C)63°F (17°C)65°F (19°C)69°F (21°C)73°F (23°C)73°F (23°C)73°F (23°C)74°F (23°C)72°F (22°C)68°F (20°C)65°F (19°C)
Rainfall0.7 in (17 mm)0.7 in (17 mm)0.7 in (19 mm)1.4 in (37 mm)4.3 in (110 mm)4.4 in (111 mm)3 in (76 mm)3.9 in (100 mm)5 in (128 mm)3.9 in (100 mm)1.7 in (43 mm)0.6 in (16 mm)
Rainy days334715171517201774
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine319 h305 h342 h356 h357 h344 h377 h358 h327 h312 h292 h305 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.2°F (+1.2°C)

Models range from +1.6°F (+0.9°C) to +2.9°F (+1.6°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

89 140

About 1.6× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • February: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • March: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • May: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • June: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • July: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • August: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • September: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • October: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • November: +1.0°F (+0.5°C)
  • December: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.