ClimateSearch

Ciudad de Villa de Álvarez, Colima

Mexico · 118k people · 527 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high85°F (30°C)87°F (31°C)89°F (32°C)92°F (33°C)92°F (34°C)87°F (31°C)85°F (29°C)84°F (29°C)83°F (28°C)84°F (29°C)85°F (30°C)85°F (30°C)
Average low60°F (16°C)61°F (16°C)62°F (17°C)64°F (18°C)68°F (20°C)70°F (21°C)69°F (20°C)69°F (20°C)68°F (20°C)67°F (20°C)65°F (18°C)62°F (17°C)
Dew point55°F (13°C)55°F (13°C)54°F (12°C)54°F (12°C)60°F (16°C)69°F (20°C)69°F (21°C)70°F (21°C)70°F (21°C)69°F (20°C)64°F (18°C)58°F (14°C)
Rainfall0.9 in (24 mm)0.5 in (12 mm)0.5 in (12 mm)0.1 in (2 mm)0.7 in (18 mm)7.9 in (202 mm)7.1 in (180 mm)9 in (228 mm)10.2 in (259 mm)5.1 in (129 mm)0.9 in (23 mm)0.4 in (10 mm)
Rainy days22115212325261752
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine311 h307 h363 h357 h372 h289 h280 h275 h249 h297 h310 h312 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.1°F (+1.2°C)

Models range from +1.9°F (+1.1°C) to +2.5°F (+1.4°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

89 143

About 1.6× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • February: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • March: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • April: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • May: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • June: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • August: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • September: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • October: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • November: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • December: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.