ClimateSearch

Ciudad Madero, Tamaulipas

Mexico · 197k people · 18 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high72°F (22°C)75°F (24°C)78°F (26°C)82°F (28°C)85°F (30°C)86°F (30°C)86°F (30°C)86°F (30°C)84°F (29°C)82°F (28°C)77°F (25°C)74°F (23°C)
Average low63°F (17°C)65°F (18°C)68°F (20°C)72°F (22°C)76°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)76°F (25°C)73°F (23°C)68°F (20°C)65°F (18°C)
Dew point60°F (15°C)62°F (17°C)65°F (18°C)69°F (21°C)73°F (23°C)75°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)74°F (23°C)70°F (21°C)65°F (18°C)61°F (16°C)
Rainfall1.5 in (38 mm)0.9 in (23 mm)1 in (25 mm)1.2 in (31 mm)1.7 in (44 mm)4.7 in (119 mm)5.1 in (129 mm)4.8 in (122 mm)7.9 in (201 mm)4.7 in (119 mm)1.9 in (49 mm)1 in (26 mm)
Rainy days75558161819211396
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine233 h240 h297 h330 h374 h352 h364 h360 h295 h300 h263 h248 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.0°F (+1.1°C)

Models range from +1.6°F (+0.9°C) to +2.5°F (+1.4°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

6 18

About 3.0× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • February: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • March: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • April: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • May: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • June: +2.1°F (+1.1°C)
  • July: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • August: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • September: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • October: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • November: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • December: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.