ClimateSearch

Criciúma, Santa Catarina

Brazil · 227k people · 49 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high85°F (30°C)84°F (29°C)84°F (29°C)79°F (26°C)74°F (23°C)71°F (22°C)69°F (21°C)72°F (22°C)73°F (23°C)76°F (24°C)80°F (27°C)84°F (29°C)
Average low66°F (19°C)66°F (19°C)64°F (18°C)59°F (15°C)54°F (12°C)52°F (11°C)48°F (9°C)51°F (10°C)55°F (13°C)59°F (15°C)61°F (16°C)64°F (18°C)
Dew point68°F (20°C)69°F (20°C)67°F (19°C)63°F (17°C)57°F (14°C)54°F (12°C)52°F (11°C)54°F (12°C)56°F (14°C)60°F (16°C)62°F (17°C)66°F (19°C)
Rainfall7.7 in (195 mm)6.5 in (164 mm)5.3 in (134 mm)4.3 in (108 mm)3.9 in (100 mm)3.7 in (94 mm)2.8 in (71 mm)3 in (77 mm)5 in (127 mm)4.9 in (125 mm)4 in (101 mm)4.1 in (104 mm)
Rainy days13121088888101199
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine203 h183 h198 h183 h171 h156 h170 h186 h153 h151 h195 h218 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.4°F (+0.8°C)

Models range from +1.0°F (+0.6°C) to +1.8°F (+1.0°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

10 → 13

About 1.4× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • February: +0.8°F (+0.4°C)
  • March: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • April: +1.2°F (+0.6°C)
  • May: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • June: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • July: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • August: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • September: +1.1°F (+0.6°C)
  • October: +1.1°F (+0.6°C)
  • November: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • December: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.