ClimateSearch

Criciúma, Santa Catarina

Brazil · 227k people · 49 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high81°F (27°C)81°F (27°C)80°F (27°C)76°F (25°C)71°F (22°C)68°F (20°C)67°F (19°C)70°F (21°C)71°F (22°C)74°F (23°C)77°F (25°C)80°F (27°C)
Average low68°F (20°C)68°F (20°C)66°F (19°C)62°F (17°C)56°F (13°C)52°F (11°C)51°F (10°C)52°F (11°C)56°F (13°C)60°F (16°C)62°F (17°C)66°F (19°C)
Dew point68°F (20°C)69°F (20°C)67°F (19°C)63°F (17°C)57°F (14°C)54°F (12°C)52°F (11°C)54°F (12°C)56°F (14°C)60°F (16°C)62°F (17°C)66°F (19°C)
Rainfall6.8 in (172 mm)5.7 in (145 mm)5.1 in (131 mm)3.9 in (99 mm)5.1 in (131 mm)3.8 in (96 mm)4 in (103 mm)3.9 in (100 mm)4.9 in (124 mm)5.5 in (139 mm)4.9 in (125 mm)4.9 in (126 mm)
Rainy days1818171211910912151415
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine328 h293 h304 h269 h254 h233 h244 h268 h248 h266 h307 h344 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.4°F (+0.8°C)

Models range from +1.0°F (+0.6°C) to +1.8°F (+1.0°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

10 13

About 1.4× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • February: +0.8°F (+0.4°C)
  • March: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • April: +1.2°F (+0.6°C)
  • May: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • June: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • July: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • August: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • September: +1.1°F (+0.6°C)
  • October: +1.1°F (+0.6°C)
  • November: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • December: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.