ClimateSearch

Curicó, Maule Region

Chile · 102k people · 211 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high86°F (30°C)84°F (29°C)78°F (26°C)69°F (20°C)60°F (16°C)55°F (13°C)54°F (12°C)57°F (14°C)63°F (17°C)69°F (21°C)76°F (24°C)82°F (28°C)
Average low56°F (13°C)54°F (12°C)50°F (10°C)44°F (7°C)42°F (5°C)39°F (4°C)38°F (3°C)39°F (4°C)42°F (6°C)46°F (8°C)50°F (10°C)54°F (12°C)
Dew point53°F (12°C)53°F (12°C)52°F (11°C)49°F (9°C)46°F (8°C)42°F (6°C)40°F (5°C)42°F (6°C)45°F (7°C)47°F (9°C)49°F (10°C)51°F (11°C)
Rainfall0.2 in (6 mm)0.2 in (5 mm)0.5 in (14 mm)1.3 in (34 mm)4.4 in (111 mm)8 in (202 mm)4.4 in (111 mm)4.3 in (110 mm)2.2 in (56 mm)1.4 in (36 mm)0.5 in (12 mm)0.4 in (11 mm)
Rainy days1113710886421
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.1 in (0.2 cm)0 in (0.1 cm)0 in (0.1 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine369 h310 h297 h214 h147 h114 h143 h157 h191 h247 h297 h351 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.2°F (+1.2°C)

Models range from +2.1°F (+1.2°C) to +2.3°F (+1.3°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

3 → 7

About 2.2× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • February: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • March: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +2.8°F (+1.5°C)
  • May: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • June: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • July: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • August: +1.1°F (+0.6°C)
  • September: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • October: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • November: +3.1°F (+1.7°C)
  • December: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.