ClimateSearch

Datia, Madhya Pradesh

India · 100k people · 249 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high71°F (22°C)79°F (26°C)90°F (32°C)100°F (38°C)106°F (41°C)102°F (39°C)91°F (33°C)87°F (31°C)89°F (32°C)90°F (32°C)83°F (28°C)74°F (24°C)
Average low48°F (9°C)54°F (12°C)63°F (17°C)73°F (23°C)81°F (27°C)84°F (29°C)80°F (26°C)77°F (25°C)75°F (24°C)68°F (20°C)59°F (15°C)51°F (10°C)
Dew point46°F (8°C)48°F (9°C)49°F (9°C)47°F (8°C)53°F (12°C)66°F (19°C)74°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)72°F (22°C)61°F (16°C)53°F (11°C)48°F (9°C)
Rainfall0.5 in (13 mm)0.6 in (14 mm)0.3 in (8 mm)0.2 in (5 mm)0.3 in (7 mm)3.3 in (85 mm)11 in (280 mm)10 in (254 mm)5 in (126 mm)0.8 in (21 mm)0.2 in (6 mm)0.3 in (8 mm)
Rainy days221229222213211
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine300 h293 h357 h359 h391 h340 h241 h230 h285 h331 h315 h303 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.5°F (+0.8°C)

Models range from +1.0°F (+0.6°C) to +1.9°F (+1.1°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

153 170

About 1.1× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +0.3°F (+0.2°C)
  • February: −0.3°F (−0.2°C)
  • March: −0.2°F (−0.1°C)
  • April: −0.5°F (−0.3°C)
  • May: +0.4°F (+0.2°C)
  • June: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • July: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • August: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • September: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • October: +0.1°F (+0.1°C)
  • November: −0.4°F (−0.2°C)
  • December: +0.2°F (+0.1°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.