ClimateSearch

Dohad, Gujarat

India · 119k people · 310 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high80°F (27°C)85°F (29°C)93°F (34°C)100°F (38°C)102°F (39°C)95°F (35°C)85°F (29°C)83°F (28°C)86°F (30°C)90°F (32°C)87°F (30°C)82°F (28°C)
Average low56°F (14°C)60°F (15°C)67°F (19°C)74°F (23°C)78°F (26°C)79°F (26°C)76°F (24°C)74°F (24°C)73°F (23°C)70°F (21°C)64°F (18°C)58°F (15°C)
Dew point46°F (8°C)46°F (8°C)45°F (7°C)49°F (10°C)60°F (16°C)71°F (22°C)74°F (23°C)73°F (23°C)72°F (22°C)61°F (16°C)53°F (12°C)48°F (9°C)
Rainfall0.1 in (3 mm)0.1 in (1 mm)0.1 in (1 mm)0.1 in (2 mm)0.1 in (2 mm)4.1 in (105 mm)13.3 in (338 mm)11.6 in (294 mm)5.8 in (148 mm)0.9 in (23 mm)0.3 in (7 mm)0.2 in (5 mm)
Rainy days1010110242515411
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine320 h308 h358 h358 h372 h299 h188 h189 h272 h331 h311 h307 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.5°F (+0.8°C)

Models range from +1.3°F (+0.7°C) to +1.6°F (+0.9°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

138 148

About 1.1× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +0.4°F (+0.2°C)
  • February: +0.7°F (+0.4°C)
  • March: +0.7°F (+0.4°C)
  • April: +0.8°F (+0.5°C)
  • May: +0.9°F (+0.5°C)
  • June: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • July: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • August: +1.1°F (+0.6°C)
  • September: +0.7°F (+0.4°C)
  • October: +0.1°F (+0.1°C)
  • November: +0.4°F (+0.2°C)
  • December: +0.6°F (+0.3°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.