ClimateSearch

Dongyang, Zhejiang

China · 130k people · 92 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high51°F (10°C)55°F (13°C)62°F (17°C)73°F (23°C)82°F (28°C)85°F (30°C)94°F (34°C)93°F (34°C)85°F (30°C)77°F (25°C)66°F (19°C)55°F (13°C)
Average low36°F (2°C)40°F (4°C)46°F (8°C)55°F (13°C)64°F (18°C)71°F (22°C)77°F (25°C)76°F (25°C)69°F (21°C)59°F (15°C)50°F (10°C)39°F (4°C)
Dew point34°F (1°C)37°F (3°C)44°F (7°C)54°F (12°C)62°F (17°C)70°F (21°C)75°F (24°C)74°F (23°C)67°F (20°C)56°F (14°C)47°F (9°C)37°F (3°C)
Rainfall2.2 in (57 mm)2.7 in (69 mm)4.4 in (111 mm)4.6 in (118 mm)5.9 in (150 mm)8 in (202 mm)5.1 in (128 mm)6.1 in (154 mm)4.7 in (119 mm)2.4 in (61 mm)2.8 in (71 mm)2 in (52 mm)
Rainy days91013121112798587
Snowfall2.6 in (6.7 cm)2 in (5 cm)0.4 in (0.9 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.1 in (0.2 cm)1.2 in (3.1 cm)
Sunshine109 h102 h100 h113 h123 h91 h174 h183 h146 h160 h123 h140 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.0°F (+1.1°C)

Models range from +1.7°F (+0.9°C) to +2.4°F (+1.3°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

50 → 77

About 1.5× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +3.2°F (+1.8°C)
  • February: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • March: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • April: +2.8°F (+1.5°C)
  • May: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • June: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • August: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • September: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • October: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • November: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • December: +3.2°F (+1.8°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.