ClimateSearch

Foz do Iguaçu, Paraná

Brazil · 297k people · 179 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high91°F (33°C)90°F (32°C)88°F (31°C)84°F (29°C)76°F (24°C)73°F (23°C)74°F (23°C)79°F (26°C)81°F (27°C)85°F (30°C)88°F (31°C)91°F (33°C)
Average low68°F (20°C)67°F (20°C)65°F (18°C)61°F (16°C)55°F (13°C)53°F (12°C)50°F (10°C)53°F (12°C)57°F (14°C)62°F (17°C)64°F (18°C)66°F (19°C)
Dew point72°F (22°C)71°F (22°C)69°F (21°C)65°F (19°C)60°F (16°C)58°F (14°C)56°F (13°C)56°F (14°C)60°F (15°C)65°F (18°C)66°F (19°C)70°F (21°C)
Rainfall7 in (177 mm)5.7 in (144 mm)5.4 in (136 mm)5 in (126 mm)5.9 in (149 mm)5.2 in (132 mm)3.8 in (97 mm)3.4 in (88 mm)5.1 in (130 mm)8.1 in (206 mm)6.7 in (170 mm)6.4 in (163 mm)
Rainy days1110978876811910
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine228 h195 h215 h191 h168 h153 h178 h203 h188 h193 h214 h225 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.7°F (+0.9°C)

Models range from +1.4°F (+0.8°C) to +1.8°F (+1.0°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

38 → 71

About 1.9× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • February: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • March: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • May: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • June: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • July: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • August: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • September: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • October: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • November: +1.5°F (+0.9°C)
  • December: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.