ClimateSearch

Fuling, Chongqing

China · 269k people · 228 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high50°F (10°C)54°F (12°C)64°F (18°C)73°F (23°C)81°F (27°C)86°F (30°C)91°F (33°C)92°F (33°C)83°F (28°C)71°F (22°C)63°F (17°C)53°F (12°C)
Average low42°F (5°C)45°F (7°C)51°F (11°C)59°F (15°C)66°F (19°C)71°F (22°C)76°F (24°C)76°F (24°C)69°F (21°C)61°F (16°C)54°F (12°C)45°F (7°C)
Dew point39°F (4°C)42°F (6°C)49°F (9°C)58°F (14°C)65°F (18°C)71°F (22°C)75°F (24°C)74°F (23°C)68°F (20°C)60°F (15°C)51°F (11°C)42°F (6°C)
Rainfall0.6 in (16 mm)0.8 in (21 mm)1.9 in (47 mm)3.9 in (100 mm)6.4 in (162 mm)7.6 in (192 mm)6.1 in (155 mm)5.3 in (134 mm)5.4 in (138 mm)3.9 in (98 mm)2.1 in (53 mm)0.9 in (22 mm)
Rainy days45911131210891196
Snowfall0.4 in (1.1 cm)0.2 in (0.4 cm)0 in (0.1 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.2 in (0.5 cm)
Sunshine63 h59 h78 h95 h107 h106 h160 h171 h120 h71 h67 h61 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.0°F (+1.1°C)

Models range from +1.3°F (+0.7°C) to +2.4°F (+1.3°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

43 → 70

About 1.6× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • February: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • March: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • April: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • May: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • June: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • July: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • August: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • September: +3.3°F (+1.8°C)
  • October: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • November: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • December: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.