ClimateSearch

Gangtok, Sikkim

India · 100k people · 1636 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high61°F (16°C)64°F (18°C)69°F (21°C)73°F (23°C)76°F (25°C)79°F (26°C)79°F (26°C)79°F (26°C)77°F (25°C)75°F (24°C)70°F (21°C)64°F (18°C)
Average low42°F (6°C)46°F (8°C)50°F (10°C)55°F (13°C)59°F (15°C)64°F (18°C)65°F (18°C)65°F (19°C)63°F (17°C)58°F (14°C)51°F (11°C)46°F (8°C)
Dew point39°F (4°C)42°F (6°C)46°F (8°C)51°F (11°C)57°F (14°C)62°F (17°C)64°F (18°C)63°F (17°C)61°F (16°C)54°F (12°C)47°F (9°C)42°F (6°C)
Rainfall0.8 in (21 mm)1.6 in (41 mm)3.6 in (93 mm)6.2 in (156 mm)9 in (228 mm)18.1 in (460 mm)27.2 in (692 mm)24.1 in (611 mm)17.9 in (455 mm)4.9 in (124 mm)0.6 in (16 mm)0.3 in (7 mm)
Rainy days412192123273029251630
Snowfall2.2 in (5.7 cm)1.5 in (3.9 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.4 in (0.9 cm)
Sunshine144 h138 h192 h201 h178 h98 h48 h67 h106 h191 h174 h168 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.4°F (+0.8°C)

Models range from +0.5°F (+0.3°C) to +2.2°F (+1.2°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

0 → 0

Warming by month
  • January: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • February: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • March: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • April: +0.7°F (+0.4°C)
  • May: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • June: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • July: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • August: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • September: +1.1°F (+0.6°C)
  • October: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • November: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • December: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.