ClimateSearch

Gereida, Southern Darfur

Sudan · 120k people · 480 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high91°F (33°C)96°F (35°C)100°F (38°C)103°F (39°C)102°F (39°C)97°F (36°C)92°F (34°C)89°F (32°C)92°F (34°C)96°F (36°C)96°F (35°C)92°F (34°C)
Average low59°F (15°C)64°F (18°C)69°F (21°C)73°F (23°C)76°F (24°C)74°F (23°C)73°F (23°C)71°F (22°C)71°F (22°C)70°F (21°C)65°F (19°C)60°F (16°C)
Dew point26°F (-3°C)23°F (-5°C)24°F (-5°C)33°F (1°C)54°F (12°C)67°F (19°C)70°F (21°C)71°F (21°C)71°F (21°C)60°F (15°C)36°F (2°C)29°F (-1°C)
Rainfall0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0.1 in (3 mm)0.7 in (18 mm)2.4 in (61 mm)4.4 in (112 mm)6.6 in (168 mm)3.5 in (89 mm)1.2 in (30 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)
Rainy days00013510138400
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine264 h238 h256 h255 h252 h216 h190 h173 h197 h238 h274 h273 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.5°F (+0.9°C)

Models range from +1.2°F (+0.7°C) to +1.9°F (+1.1°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

251 → 265

About 1.1× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +0.7°F (+0.4°C)
  • February: +1.0°F (+0.6°C)
  • March: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • April: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • May: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • June: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • July: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • August: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • September: +0.8°F (+0.5°C)
  • October: −0.3°F (−0.1°C)
  • November: +0.4°F (+0.2°C)
  • December: +0.7°F (+0.4°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.