ClimateSearch

Ghulja, Xinjiang

China · 269k people · 645 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high25°F (-4°C)33°F (0°C)50°F (10°C)69°F (20°C)78°F (26°C)85°F (30°C)88°F (31°C)87°F (30°C)78°F (26°C)63°F (17°C)45°F (7°C)30°F (-1°C)
Average low2°F (-17°C)10°F (-12°C)29°F (-2°C)44°F (7°C)53°F (12°C)60°F (16°C)62°F (17°C)59°F (15°C)49°F (10°C)37°F (3°C)25°F (-4°C)10°F (-12°C)
Dew point9°F (-13°C)13°F (-11°C)23°F (-5°C)33°F (0°C)39°F (4°C)46°F (8°C)49°F (10°C)47°F (8°C)39°F (4°C)31°F (-1°C)21°F (-6°C)12°F (-11°C)
Rainfall0.6 in (15 mm)0.7 in (17 mm)0.6 in (16 mm)1.1 in (28 mm)1 in (26 mm)1.1 in (28 mm)1 in (25 mm)0.7 in (17 mm)0.6 in (15 mm)0.8 in (21 mm)1 in (26 mm)0.8 in (21 mm)
Rainy days444655433454
Snowfall3.9 in (9.8 cm)3.5 in (9 cm)1.8 in (4.6 cm)0.6 in (1.5 cm)0 in (0.1 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.6 in (1.6 cm)2.4 in (6 cm)4.6 in (11.7 cm)
Sunshine166 h166 h205 h219 h245 h250 h283 h279 h244 h214 h157 h156 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+3.2°F (+1.8°C)

Models range from +2.2°F (+1.2°C) to +3.9°F (+2.2°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

20 → 32

About 1.6× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • February: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • March: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • April: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • May: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • June: +3.4°F (+1.9°C)
  • July: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • August: +3.3°F (+1.8°C)
  • September: +3.4°F (+1.9°C)
  • October: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • November: +3.5°F (+1.9°C)
  • December: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.