ClimateSearch

Gonbad-e Kāvūs, Golestan

Iran · 152k people · 40 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high55°F (13°C)56°F (14°C)63°F (17°C)72°F (22°C)82°F (28°C)91°F (33°C)94°F (35°C)94°F (35°C)88°F (31°C)78°F (25°C)65°F (18°C)58°F (14°C)
Average low35°F (2°C)36°F (2°C)42°F (5°C)50°F (10°C)59°F (15°C)67°F (20°C)73°F (23°C)72°F (22°C)66°F (19°C)55°F (13°C)45°F (7°C)38°F (3°C)
Dew point33°F (1°C)35°F (2°C)42°F (5°C)49°F (10°C)56°F (13°C)60°F (16°C)65°F (18°C)63°F (17°C)59°F (15°C)50°F (10°C)42°F (6°C)36°F (2°C)
Rainfall2.1 in (52 mm)2.7 in (68 mm)3.1 in (79 mm)2.5 in (63 mm)1.5 in (38 mm)1.1 in (27 mm)1.3 in (34 mm)1.3 in (32 mm)1.4 in (36 mm)1.4 in (36 mm)2 in (50 mm)1.4 in (37 mm)
Rainy days7810864755576
Snowfall1.8 in (4.5 cm)3.3 in (8.5 cm)0.9 in (2.4 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.3 in (0.7 cm)0.6 in (1.6 cm)
Sunshine236 h235 h267 h293 h342 h368 h371 h370 h324 h289 h249 h235 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.7°F (+1.5°C)

Models range from +2.0°F (+1.1°C) to +3.6°F (+2.0°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

83 99

About 1.2× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • February: +1.9°F (+1.0°C)
  • March: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • April: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • May: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • June: +3.0°F (+1.6°C)
  • July: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • August: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • September: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • October: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • November: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • December: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.