ClimateSearch

Ipatinga, Minas Gerais

Brazil · 235k people · 231 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high87°F (31°C)88°F (31°C)86°F (30°C)83°F (29°C)80°F (27°C)78°F (26°C)79°F (26°C)81°F (27°C)84°F (29°C)86°F (30°C)84°F (29°C)85°F (30°C)
Average low72°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)70°F (21°C)65°F (19°C)63°F (17°C)62°F (17°C)63°F (17°C)66°F (19°C)69°F (21°C)70°F (21°C)71°F (22°C)
Dew point69°F (21°C)68°F (20°C)69°F (21°C)67°F (20°C)63°F (17°C)61°F (16°C)58°F (15°C)58°F (14°C)60°F (15°C)63°F (17°C)67°F (20°C)70°F (21°C)
Rainfall7 in (177 mm)4 in (102 mm)5 in (126 mm)2.6 in (66 mm)1.1 in (28 mm)0.4 in (10 mm)0.3 in (7 mm)0.4 in (11 mm)1.5 in (37 mm)3.4 in (87 mm)7.4 in (188 mm)9.4 in (238 mm)
Rainy days14101395222691617
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine308 h300 h319 h296 h281 h266 h270 h289 h276 h282 h262 h290 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.4°F (+0.8°C)

Models range from +1.0°F (+0.6°C) to +2.0°F (+1.1°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

51 89

About 1.7× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • February: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • March: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • May: +1.1°F (+0.6°C)
  • June: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • July: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • August: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • September: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • October: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • November: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • December: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.