ClimateSearch

Jiangmen, Guangdong

China · 1.8M people · 16 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high65°F (18°C)67°F (19°C)72°F (22°C)79°F (26°C)85°F (30°C)89°F (32°C)91°F (33°C)91°F (33°C)88°F (31°C)84°F (29°C)77°F (25°C)68°F (20°C)
Average low52°F (11°C)55°F (13°C)60°F (16°C)68°F (20°C)74°F (23°C)78°F (26°C)79°F (26°C)78°F (26°C)76°F (25°C)71°F (22°C)63°F (17°C)55°F (13°C)
Dew point48°F (9°C)53°F (12°C)60°F (16°C)68°F (20°C)73°F (23°C)77°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)74°F (23°C)66°F (19°C)57°F (14°C)48°F (9°C)
Rainfall1.5 in (39 mm)1.8 in (46 mm)3.4 in (87 mm)6.4 in (163 mm)10 in (255 mm)12.5 in (317 mm)10.6 in (269 mm)11.4 in (289 mm)6.9 in (175 mm)2.8 in (70 mm)1.5 in (38 mm)1.5 in (37 mm)
Rainy days568101518161711444
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine136 h91 h86 h105 h122 h120 h166 h153 h169 h206 h178 h165 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.5°F (+0.8°C)

Models range from +1.1°F (+0.6°C) to +2.2°F (+1.2°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

36 → 64

About 1.8× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • February: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • March: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • April: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • May: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • June: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • July: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • August: +1.1°F (+0.6°C)
  • September: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • October: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • November: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • December: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.