ClimateSearch

Jiangyin, Jiangsu

China · 1.8M people · 7 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high46°F (8°C)50°F (10°C)58°F (15°C)69°F (21°C)78°F (25°C)83°F (28°C)89°F (31°C)88°F (31°C)81°F (27°C)72°F (22°C)62°F (17°C)50°F (10°C)
Average low31°F (0°C)35°F (1°C)41°F (5°C)51°F (11°C)61°F (16°C)69°F (21°C)77°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)68°F (20°C)58°F (14°C)47°F (8°C)35°F (2°C)
Dew point30°F (-1°C)33°F (1°C)40°F (5°C)50°F (10°C)60°F (15°C)68°F (20°C)76°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)67°F (19°C)56°F (13°C)45°F (7°C)33°F (1°C)
Rainfall2.3 in (57 mm)2.2 in (55 mm)3.1 in (80 mm)3.5 in (90 mm)4.5 in (115 mm)9.2 in (234 mm)8.4 in (212 mm)6.9 in (175 mm)3.5 in (89 mm)2.1 in (53 mm)2.2 in (55 mm)1.5 in (38 mm)
Rainy days88109101315159676
Snowfall1.9 in (4.7 cm)1.3 in (3.2 cm)0.4 in (1 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0.1 cm)0.3 in (0.8 cm)
Sunshine202 h189 h224 h241 h263 h236 h278 h279 h254 h243 h206 h212 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.3°F (+1.3°C)

Models range from +1.9°F (+1.1°C) to +2.8°F (+1.5°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

31 59

About 1.9× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
  • February: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • March: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • April: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • May: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • June: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • July: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • August: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • September: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • October: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
  • November: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
  • December: +3.2°F (+1.8°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.