ClimateSearch

Jiaojiang, Zhejiang

China · 471k people · 7 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high51°F (11°C)54°F (12°C)60°F (16°C)69°F (20°C)77°F (25°C)81°F (27°C)89°F (31°C)89°F (31°C)83°F (28°C)76°F (24°C)67°F (19°C)56°F (14°C)
Average low39°F (4°C)40°F (5°C)46°F (8°C)54°F (12°C)64°F (18°C)71°F (22°C)78°F (25°C)78°F (25°C)72°F (22°C)63°F (17°C)54°F (12°C)42°F (6°C)
Dew point37°F (3°C)40°F (4°C)46°F (8°C)55°F (13°C)64°F (18°C)72°F (22°C)77°F (25°C)76°F (25°C)70°F (21°C)60°F (16°C)51°F (11°C)40°F (5°C)
Rainfall1.8 in (45 mm)2.3 in (60 mm)3.9 in (100 mm)4.1 in (104 mm)5.6 in (142 mm)7.5 in (191 mm)4.6 in (117 mm)7.8 in (198 mm)7.1 in (180 mm)3.1 in (79 mm)3 in (77 mm)2 in (51 mm)
Rainy days7913111011699587
Snowfall0.7 in (1.8 cm)0.3 in (0.7 cm)0.1 in (0.2 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.4 in (0.9 cm)
Sunshine123 h105 h111 h115 h117 h83 h176 h184 h161 h176 h127 h144 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.8°F (+1.0°C)

Models range from +1.6°F (+0.9°C) to +2.0°F (+1.1°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

25 → 68

About 2.8× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • February: +1.9°F (+1.0°C)
  • March: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • April: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • May: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • June: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • July: +1.5°F (+0.9°C)
  • August: +1.9°F (+1.0°C)
  • September: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • October: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • November: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • December: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.