ClimateSearch

Jiaojiang, Zhejiang

China · 471k people · 7 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high52°F (11°C)54°F (12°C)60°F (16°C)69°F (21°C)76°F (25°C)82°F (28°C)89°F (32°C)88°F (31°C)82°F (28°C)74°F (23°C)66°F (19°C)56°F (13°C)
Average low39°F (4°C)41°F (5°C)47°F (8°C)55°F (13°C)64°F (18°C)72°F (22°C)78°F (26°C)78°F (26°C)72°F (22°C)63°F (17°C)54°F (12°C)43°F (6°C)
Dew point37°F (3°C)40°F (4°C)46°F (8°C)55°F (13°C)64°F (18°C)72°F (22°C)77°F (25°C)76°F (25°C)70°F (21°C)60°F (16°C)51°F (11°C)40°F (5°C)
Rainfall2.4 in (62 mm)2.7 in (68 mm)4.6 in (118 mm)4.5 in (116 mm)6.6 in (167 mm)10.4 in (263 mm)5.9 in (149 mm)8.6 in (218 mm)6.3 in (159 mm)3.2 in (82 mm)2.9 in (73 mm)2.5 in (64 mm)
Rainy days91014141417141914798
Snowfall0.7 in (1.8 cm)0.3 in (0.7 cm)0.1 in (0.2 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.4 in (0.9 cm)
Sunshine196 h179 h204 h218 h231 h199 h313 h302 h260 h255 h200 h209 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.8°F (+1.0°C)

Models range from +1.6°F (+0.9°C) to +2.0°F (+1.1°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

25 68

About 2.8× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • February: +1.9°F (+1.0°C)
  • March: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • April: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • May: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • June: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • July: +1.5°F (+0.9°C)
  • August: +1.9°F (+1.0°C)
  • September: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • October: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • November: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • December: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.