ClimateSearch

Jiujiang, Jiangxi

China · 1.2M people · 40 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high47°F (9°C)52°F (11°C)60°F (16°C)71°F (22°C)79°F (26°C)84°F (29°C)90°F (32°C)89°F (32°C)82°F (28°C)73°F (23°C)62°F (17°C)51°F (11°C)
Average low36°F (2°C)39°F (4°C)46°F (8°C)57°F (14°C)66°F (19°C)73°F (23°C)79°F (26°C)78°F (26°C)71°F (21°C)61°F (16°C)50°F (10°C)40°F (4°C)
Dew point34°F (1°C)38°F (4°C)46°F (8°C)56°F (14°C)65°F (19°C)72°F (22°C)77°F (25°C)76°F (25°C)69°F (20°C)58°F (15°C)48°F (9°C)38°F (3°C)
Rainfall2.9 in (73 mm)3.9 in (100 mm)6.1 in (155 mm)7.8 in (199 mm)9.2 in (234 mm)13.1 in (333 mm)9.4 in (238 mm)6.6 in (168 mm)3.4 in (87 mm)2.4 in (62 mm)2.6 in (66 mm)2 in (50 mm)
Rainy days10111515141716179787
Snowfall2.5 in (6.3 cm)1.3 in (3.4 cm)0.3 in (0.7 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.1 in (0.3 cm)0.7 in (1.9 cm)
Sunshine180 h178 h189 h219 h246 h234 h297 h304 h267 h239 h200 h203 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.9°F (+1.1°C)

Models range from +1.5°F (+0.8°C) to +2.4°F (+1.4°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

38 63

About 1.7× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +3.3°F (+1.9°C)
  • February: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • March: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • April: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • May: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • June: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • August: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • September: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • October: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
  • November: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • December: +3.3°F (+1.8°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.