ClimateSearch

Kaithal, Haryana

India · 145k people · 235 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high66°F (19°C)74°F (23°C)84°F (29°C)97°F (36°C)104°F (40°C)103°F (39°C)96°F (35°C)93°F (34°C)92°F (34°C)90°F (32°C)82°F (28°C)72°F (22°C)
Average low44°F (7°C)50°F (10°C)58°F (14°C)67°F (20°C)76°F (25°C)80°F (27°C)80°F (27°C)79°F (26°C)76°F (24°C)65°F (19°C)53°F (12°C)45°F (7°C)
Dew point46°F (8°C)48°F (9°C)52°F (11°C)50°F (10°C)55°F (13°C)67°F (20°C)76°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)73°F (23°C)59°F (15°C)51°F (11°C)46°F (8°C)
Rainfall1 in (26 mm)0.6 in (16 mm)0.7 in (17 mm)0.2 in (5 mm)0.3 in (7 mm)1.5 in (37 mm)4.5 in (114 mm)4.9 in (125 mm)4.1 in (105 mm)0.8 in (21 mm)0.1 in (3 mm)0.2 in (4 mm)
Rainy days3331139106111
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine217 h213 h267 h278 h316 h290 h187 h182 h252 h300 h260 h241 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.3°F (+0.7°C)

Models range from +0.3°F (+0.2°C) to +2.1°F (+1.2°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

156 → 165

About 1.1× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +0.8°F (+0.4°C)
  • February: +0.6°F (+0.4°C)
  • March: +0.6°F (+0.3°C)
  • April: −0.4°F (−0.2°C)
  • May: +0.3°F (+0.2°C)
  • June: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • July: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • August: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • September: +0.1°F (+0.1°C)
  • October: −0.8°F (−0.4°C)
  • November: −0.2°F (−0.1°C)
  • December: +0.8°F (+0.5°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.