ClimateSearch

Kāshmar, Razavi Khorasan

Iran · 132k people · 1055 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high47°F (8°C)51°F (11°C)62°F (16°C)74°F (24°C)85°F (30°C)94°F (35°C)98°F (36°C)95°F (35°C)87°F (31°C)75°F (24°C)60°F (16°C)50°F (10°C)
Average low30°F (-1°C)33°F (1°C)41°F (5°C)51°F (11°C)61°F (16°C)69°F (20°C)72°F (22°C)67°F (20°C)60°F (16°C)52°F (11°C)42°F (5°C)34°F (1°C)
Dew point24°F (-4°C)28°F (-2°C)32°F (0°C)35°F (2°C)36°F (2°C)36°F (2°C)39°F (4°C)35°F (2°C)30°F (-1°C)29°F (-1°C)28°F (-2°C)26°F (-3°C)
Rainfall1 in (27 mm)1.3 in (33 mm)1.6 in (40 mm)0.8 in (21 mm)0.3 in (6 mm)0 in (1 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0.1 in (3 mm)0.4 in (10 mm)0.6 in (16 mm)
Rainy days567420000134
Snowfall2.2 in (5.7 cm)1.1 in (2.8 cm)0.5 in (1.2 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0.1 cm)0.8 in (2 cm)
Sunshine267 h269 h319 h338 h395 h412 h417 h390 h357 h323 h279 h270 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+3.1°F (+1.7°C)

Models range from +2.3°F (+1.3°C) to +3.9°F (+2.2°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

100 114

About 1.1× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • February: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • March: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • April: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • May: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • June: +3.3°F (+1.9°C)
  • July: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • August: +3.2°F (+1.8°C)
  • September: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • October: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • November: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • December: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.