ClimateSearch

Khorramabad, Lorestan Province

Iran · 330k people · 1185 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high58°F (15°C)63°F (17°C)70°F (21°C)78°F (26°C)89°F (32°C)102°F (39°C)108°F (42°C)107°F (42°C)99°F (37°C)87°F (30°C)71°F (21°C)62°F (17°C)
Average low38°F (3°C)40°F (5°C)46°F (8°C)53°F (12°C)60°F (16°C)67°F (20°C)74°F (23°C)72°F (22°C)63°F (17°C)55°F (13°C)46°F (8°C)41°F (5°C)
Dew point28°F (-2°C)31°F (-1°C)37°F (3°C)44°F (7°C)45°F (7°C)40°F (5°C)41°F (5°C)40°F (4°C)36°F (2°C)39°F (4°C)38°F (3°C)32°F (0°C)
Rainfall3 in (75 mm)2.6 in (67 mm)2.9 in (73 mm)2.6 in (67 mm)1 in (25 mm)0.1 in (2 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0.9 in (23 mm)2.3 in (59 mm)3.1 in (78 mm)
Rainy days999841000378
Snowfall11.4 in (28.9 cm)6.5 in (16.6 cm)2.9 in (7.4 cm)0 in (0.1 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.4 in (1.1 cm)4.2 in (10.6 cm)
Sunshine180 h176 h220 h243 h305 h371 h375 h355 h325 h268 h198 h173 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.6°F (+1.5°C)

Models range from +2.3°F (+1.3°C) to +3.2°F (+1.8°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

110 → 120

About 1.1× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • February: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • March: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • April: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • May: +1.1°F (+0.6°C)
  • June: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • July: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • August: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • September: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • October: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • November: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • December: +3.2°F (+1.8°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.