ClimateSearch

Milagro, Guayas

Ecuador · 134k people · 15 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high87°F (30°C)87°F (30°C)88°F (31°C)88°F (31°C)87°F (31°C)84°F (29°C)83°F (28°C)83°F (29°C)85°F (29°C)85°F (29°C)85°F (29°C)87°F (31°C)
Average low71°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)71°F (22°C)69°F (21°C)68°F (20°C)67°F (19°C)67°F (20°C)68°F (20°C)68°F (20°C)70°F (21°C)
Dew point71°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)73°F (23°C)73°F (23°C)72°F (22°C)70°F (21°C)69°F (20°C)68°F (20°C)68°F (20°C)68°F (20°C)68°F (20°C)70°F (21°C)
Rainfall11 in (280 mm)13 in (330 mm)14.8 in (377 mm)11.9 in (302 mm)3.3 in (85 mm)1.3 in (34 mm)0.7 in (17 mm)0.1 in (2 mm)0.3 in (7 mm)0.3 in (7 mm)0.6 in (14 mm)2.6 in (66 mm)
Rainy days1821201991000005
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine87 h72 h81 h94 h96 h104 h117 h132 h111 h103 h108 h103 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.4°F (+0.8°C)

Models range from +0.8°F (+0.5°C) to +1.9°F (+1.1°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

1 → 1

About 1.8× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • February: +1.5°F (+0.9°C)
  • March: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • April: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • May: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • June: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • July: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • August: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • September: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • October: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • November: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • December: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.