ClimateSearch

Muriaé, Minas Gerais

Brazil · 108k people · 206 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high90°F (32°C)91°F (33°C)89°F (32°C)86°F (30°C)82°F (28°C)81°F (27°C)80°F (27°C)83°F (28°C)86°F (30°C)87°F (31°C)85°F (30°C)87°F (30°C)
Average low67°F (20°C)66°F (19°C)66°F (19°C)63°F (17°C)57°F (14°C)55°F (13°C)53°F (12°C)55°F (13°C)60°F (15°C)63°F (17°C)64°F (18°C)66°F (19°C)
Dew point70°F (21°C)70°F (21°C)70°F (21°C)67°F (20°C)63°F (17°C)61°F (16°C)59°F (15°C)59°F (15°C)61°F (16°C)65°F (18°C)68°F (20°C)70°F (21°C)
Rainfall8.4 in (214 mm)7.1 in (182 mm)5.5 in (140 mm)2.5 in (63 mm)1.4 in (34 mm)0.7 in (19 mm)0.6 in (14 mm)0.4 in (11 mm)1.6 in (42 mm)3.7 in (95 mm)7.6 in (192 mm)10.6 in (269 mm)
Rainy days12101154221471316
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine170 h182 h183 h189 h189 h188 h192 h204 h182 h163 h135 h160 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.4°F (+0.8°C)

Models range from +1.1°F (+0.6°C) to +2.2°F (+1.2°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

42 → 72

About 1.7× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • February: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • March: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • April: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • May: +0.9°F (+0.5°C)
  • June: +1.0°F (+0.5°C)
  • July: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • August: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • September: +1.9°F (+1.0°C)
  • October: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • November: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • December: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.