ClimateSearch

Najaf, Najaf

Iraq · 483k people · 41 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high61°F (16°C)67°F (19°C)77°F (25°C)88°F (31°C)100°F (38°C)108°F (42°C)112°F (44°C)112°F (44°C)105°F (41°C)94°F (34°C)75°F (24°C)64°F (18°C)
Average low42°F (5°C)44°F (7°C)53°F (11°C)63°F (17°C)73°F (23°C)81°F (27°C)85°F (29°C)84°F (29°C)77°F (25°C)67°F (20°C)53°F (12°C)44°F (7°C)
Dew point39°F (4°C)37°F (3°C)36°F (2°C)39°F (4°C)40°F (4°C)40°F (5°C)44°F (6°C)46°F (8°C)45°F (7°C)44°F (7°C)44°F (6°C)40°F (5°C)
Rainfall0.7 in (19 mm)0.5 in (13 mm)0.4 in (11 mm)0.4 in (11 mm)0.1 in (3 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0.1 in (3 mm)0.6 in (16 mm)0.6 in (16 mm)
Rainy days432210000123
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine277 h279 h338 h342 h390 h406 h407 h382 h356 h326 h281 h279 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.7°F (+1.5°C)

Models range from +2.4°F (+1.3°C) to +3.2°F (+1.8°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

187 194

Roughly unchanged

Warming by month
  • January: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • February: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • March: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • April: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • May: +1.0°F (+0.5°C)
  • June: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • July: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • August: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • September: +3.1°F (+1.7°C)
  • October: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • November: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • December: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.