ClimateSearch

Nanded, Maharashtra

India · 551k people · 363 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high86°F (30°C)92°F (33°C)98°F (37°C)104°F (40°C)108°F (42°C)99°F (37°C)88°F (31°C)87°F (31°C)88°F (31°C)90°F (32°C)87°F (31°C)85°F (30°C)
Average low60°F (15°C)64°F (18°C)71°F (21°C)77°F (25°C)82°F (28°C)78°F (26°C)74°F (24°C)74°F (23°C)73°F (23°C)70°F (21°C)63°F (17°C)59°F (15°C)
Dew point51°F (11°C)50°F (10°C)51°F (10°C)52°F (11°C)56°F (13°C)69°F (20°C)71°F (22°C)71°F (22°C)71°F (22°C)66°F (19°C)58°F (15°C)52°F (11°C)
Rainfall0.2 in (6 mm)0.2 in (5 mm)0.9 in (22 mm)0.6 in (15 mm)0.4 in (11 mm)6.3 in (161 mm)11.3 in (287 mm)10.5 in (266 mm)9.8 in (248 mm)2.6 in (66 mm)0.6 in (15 mm)0.2 in (5 mm)
Rainy days1122110151412521
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine260 h262 h304 h293 h295 h149 h79 h83 h138 h223 h249 h257 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.5°F (+0.9°C)

Models range from +1.3°F (+0.7°C) to +1.7°F (+1.0°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

142 → 156

About 1.1× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +0.0°F (+0.0°C)
  • February: +0.0°F (+0.0°C)
  • March: −0.3°F (−0.1°C)
  • April: −0.5°F (−0.3°C)
  • May: +0.9°F (+0.5°C)
  • June: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • July: +1.2°F (+0.6°C)
  • August: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • September: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • October: +0.9°F (+0.5°C)
  • November: +0.7°F (+0.4°C)
  • December: +0.2°F (+0.1°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.