ClimateSearch

Nong Khaem, Bangkok

Thailand · 150k people · 6 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high90°F (32°C)91°F (33°C)93°F (34°C)95°F (35°C)94°F (35°C)93°F (34°C)92°F (33°C)92°F (33°C)91°F (33°C)91°F (33°C)91°F (33°C)89°F (32°C)
Average low71°F (22°C)74°F (23°C)77°F (25°C)79°F (26°C)79°F (26°C)78°F (26°C)78°F (25°C)78°F (25°C)76°F (25°C)76°F (24°C)74°F (24°C)71°F (22°C)
Dew point66°F (19°C)69°F (21°C)73°F (23°C)74°F (24°C)76°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)74°F (24°C)74°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)74°F (23°C)69°F (21°C)64°F (18°C)
Rainfall0.3 in (8 mm)0.3 in (8 mm)1.6 in (40 mm)2.4 in (62 mm)6.1 in (156 mm)4.3 in (110 mm)5.3 in (135 mm)6 in (151 mm)10.1 in (257 mm)8.6 in (219 mm)1.6 in (39 mm)0.2 in (5 mm)
Rainy days113412101113181640
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine240 h231 h244 h224 h176 h136 h121 h110 h118 h162 h203 h222 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.6°F (+0.9°C)

Models range from +1.5°F (+0.8°C) to +1.8°F (+1.0°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

150 → 212

About 1.4× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.1°F (+0.6°C)
  • February: +1.0°F (+0.6°C)
  • March: +1.0°F (+0.6°C)
  • April: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • May: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • June: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • July: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • August: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • September: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • October: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • November: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • December: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.