ClimateSearch

Nova Lima, Minas Gerais

Brazil · 121k people · 749 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high84°F (29°C)85°F (30°C)84°F (29°C)82°F (28°C)79°F (26°C)78°F (26°C)78°F (25°C)81°F (27°C)83°F (29°C)84°F (29°C)82°F (28°C)83°F (28°C)
Average low64°F (18°C)64°F (18°C)64°F (18°C)61°F (16°C)56°F (13°C)54°F (12°C)53°F (12°C)55°F (13°C)59°F (15°C)62°F (17°C)63°F (17°C)64°F (18°C)
Dew point67°F (19°C)66°F (19°C)66°F (19°C)64°F (18°C)59°F (15°C)56°F (13°C)54°F (12°C)54°F (12°C)57°F (14°C)61°F (16°C)64°F (18°C)67°F (19°C)
Rainfall10.6 in (270 mm)6.6 in (167 mm)6.9 in (175 mm)2.7 in (68 mm)1.2 in (31 mm)0.4 in (11 mm)0.3 in (7 mm)0.4 in (10 mm)1.7 in (44 mm)3.1 in (78 mm)7.4 in (187 mm)12.6 in (321 mm)
Rainy days15111363111581519
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine161 h175 h189 h204 h209 h210 h226 h244 h222 h199 h148 h148 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.5°F (+0.9°C)

Models range from +1.2°F (+0.6°C) to +2.0°F (+1.1°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

6 → 12

About 2.1× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • February: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • March: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • April: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • May: +1.1°F (+0.6°C)
  • June: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • July: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • August: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • September: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • October: +2.8°F (+1.5°C)
  • November: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • December: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.