ClimateSearch

Nova Serrana, Minas Gerais

Brazil · 115k people · 721 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high82°F (28°C)83°F (28°C)82°F (28°C)80°F (27°C)77°F (25°C)76°F (24°C)76°F (25°C)80°F (27°C)83°F (28°C)84°F (29°C)81°F (27°C)81°F (27°C)
Average low68°F (20°C)68°F (20°C)67°F (19°C)64°F (18°C)60°F (15°C)57°F (14°C)56°F (14°C)59°F (15°C)63°F (17°C)66°F (19°C)66°F (19°C)67°F (20°C)
Dew point66°F (19°C)65°F (19°C)66°F (19°C)63°F (17°C)58°F (15°C)55°F (13°C)53°F (12°C)52°F (11°C)55°F (13°C)60°F (16°C)64°F (18°C)67°F (19°C)
Rainfall9.7 in (246 mm)6 in (151 mm)6.5 in (165 mm)2.5 in (64 mm)1.5 in (37 mm)0.4 in (11 mm)0.3 in (7 mm)0.5 in (13 mm)2.2 in (56 mm)3.8 in (98 mm)8.4 in (213 mm)11 in (278 mm)
Rainy days201517952127122022
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine300 h297 h314 h311 h301 h286 h304 h328 h321 h322 h288 h301 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.4°F (+0.8°C)

Models range from +1.1°F (+0.6°C) to +2.0°F (+1.1°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

11 21

About 1.9× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • February: +1.2°F (+0.6°C)
  • March: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • April: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • May: +1.0°F (+0.6°C)
  • June: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • July: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • August: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • September: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • October: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
  • November: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • December: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.