ClimateSearch

Olmaliq, Tashkent Region

Uzbekistan · 133k people · 566 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high44°F (6°C)47°F (8°C)58°F (14°C)68°F (20°C)78°F (25°C)87°F (31°C)91°F (33°C)89°F (32°C)81°F (27°C)69°F (20°C)56°F (13°C)46°F (8°C)
Average low27°F (-3°C)29°F (-2°C)39°F (4°C)49°F (9°C)57°F (14°C)65°F (18°C)69°F (20°C)66°F (19°C)58°F (14°C)48°F (9°C)38°F (4°C)30°F (-1°C)
Dew point25°F (-4°C)28°F (-2°C)38°F (3°C)47°F (9°C)53°F (11°C)53°F (12°C)54°F (12°C)53°F (11°C)47°F (8°C)41°F (5°C)35°F (2°C)28°F (-2°C)
Rainfall2 in (51 mm)2.7 in (69 mm)3.4 in (88 mm)3.8 in (98 mm)2.5 in (64 mm)1 in (26 mm)0.4 in (11 mm)0.3 in (7 mm)0.4 in (9 mm)1.2 in (29 mm)2.2 in (56 mm)2.2 in (56 mm)
Rainy days9101213117322589
Snowfall6.5 in (16.6 cm)6.9 in (17.6 cm)3.2 in (8.1 cm)0.5 in (1.3 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.3 in (0.7 cm)2.9 in (7.3 cm)5.7 in (14.5 cm)
Sunshine203 h204 h263 h311 h372 h408 h427 h397 h348 h288 h221 h195 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+3.2°F (+1.8°C)

Models range from +2.8°F (+1.5°C) to +4.1°F (+2.3°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

49 66

About 1.3× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • February: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
  • March: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • April: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • May: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • June: +3.7°F (+2.1°C)
  • July: +3.1°F (+1.7°C)
  • August: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • September: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
  • October: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • November: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • December: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.